A buyer was able to enter into contract with a monopoly
Our client, a major fertilizer manufacturer had a long-standing business relationship with a monopoly supplier of potassium chloride.
Our client, a major fertilizer manufacturer had a long-standing business relationship with a monopoly supplier of potassium chloride.
Our client, one of the largest private operators in housing and communal services, requested our assistance in a dispute with the administration of one of Russia’s regions concerning unilateral raising of the rental rate for using the housing and communal services infrastructure in the region.
A Russian businessman sold a project of construction of a hotel complex with a yacht club to our client, a major property developer. When affecting the deal, the Russian businessman assumed a number of obligations and guarantees.
To accelerate registration of the ownership rights to the premises, the employee filed a claim with the court on recognizing his ownership rights to the property, providing a payment order confirming payment of more than one hundred million rubles of the purchase price.
Our client, a leading Russian provider of integrated GPS / GLONASS based security services, signed a sales contract: the client bought the business with a view of consolidation with his own assets and subsequent sale of the consolidated company.
A major engineering company requested our assistance after losing the first instance hearings in a case involving compensation of over 350 mln. Rubles worth of work and equipment costs.
Our client, a major residential property developer requested our assistance in tackling the consumer extremism problem. In some regions, where the developer had built apartment blocks, some opportunistically minded lawyers collected powers of attorney for representation in the court from the residents to file suits for compensation of revealed construction deficiencies on a mass scale.
Our client, a major producer of fertilizers entered into a contract for the supply of apatite concentrate with a supplier. During the course of contract fulfillment, a dispute arose concerning the interpretation of the pricing clause (price formula).
After several years of intra-corporate disputes, shareholders of a major transport and logistics holdings have agreed on the general terms of their separation.